How To Repair A Kitchen Mono Tap

Can the Arab world, Western democracy save?

Can the Arab world, Western democracy save? "
Our democracy sails now tricky waters. Clouds troops together and the water to the drains. Nearing the democratic an iceberg? Is the explosion of mass culture and popular entertainment on the European continent the equivalent of the aristocratic dancers on the Titanic? closer to collapse, the more intense the desire for entertainment. There is a very unexpected sun shines on the horizon.

Two Cheers for Democracy

with statements about the end of democracy we move on thin ice. In itself his concerns regarding the survival of democracy an oddity. Winston Churchill since we already know that the founders of democratic states in the mid 20 th centuries at least lovers were very cool system. It was seen as the lesser evil. And what was more, democratic principles and reforms which the head emerged within their own borders were very easily violated in the colonies in Indochina and Africa. It was the British writer Forster that best describes the mood surrounding the birth of democracy reflected in the following phrase: Two cheers for democracy.

Normative power

Nevertheless it is undeniable that we have come to love our democracy. Maybe not through the typical patriotism that we know from the pride that arose around the former imperial empires of the British jingoïsme as undeniable highlight, but still. During the nineties of the last century, we saw more and more politicians and intellectuals from both right-and left-wing located on the chest knocking under the banner of democracy. Radical critical thinkers like Noam Chomsky are rightly always been very critical. Very soon he realized that democracy was registered by some within the framework of the old hegemonic discourse. Especially the United States used the promise of bringing democracy to the world increasingly want to impose their own. First through a neoliberal economic policy. Just think of the structural adjustment plans would the World Bank and the IMF or the huge neo-liberalization of world trade: taking away money from public institutions and subsequent component huge increase in capital flows. Then came the neoconservatives. Under the mantra of the war on terror their long-cherished program of democratization in the Middle East set in motion.

short, democracy is tainted because it was hijacked by the new liberal imperialism that so aptly described by Professor David Harvey in his book The New Imperialism.

The attempt to impose a neoliberal American world hegemony tells only part of the history of the last 20 years. Equally important is the growth of the European Union. The European Union in the eyes of the German sociologist Ulrick Beck the first cosmopolitan political entity. It reflects the vision of Jürgen Habermas who sees the EU for years as a beacon of light in the new global post-national political constellation.

According to Habermas and Beck embodies the EU norms and values that can serve as a moral example for the rest of the world. And this precisely because the history of Europe has been so horrible. Because the EU is probably the first political entity that originated as a collaboration between all losers. And not just losers. Oppressed peop boxers who had a bump removed from the final knockout. Former superpowers between 1939 and 1944 already with all their property had taken place in the limbo of hell.


The malaise of the EU



But let's be honest. Proclaiming the EU as a cosmopolitan entity with normative power is laughable in the year 2011. Not only were the Europeans during the nineties of the last century, totally incapable of a sustained cycle of genocides in the Balkans a halt, the whole process of European integration since the Treaty of Nice in 2000 on the sidelines ended . The European parliament is packed with Eurosceptics, the reform of European institutions was such a cut and paste job that only inveterate Europhiles there anything of understanding, and developments within the member states within the EU have also been unedifying to mention.

It's like Italy for a while at last gasp. This paradise of macho corrupt Silvio Berlusconi still associate with democracy is a violation of good taste. And of course it is not alone. The disastrous economic policies of Greece, Ireland and Portugal now ensures that the population there is literally emaciated. Tony Blair seems to be going down in history as a clumsy liar, and Chirac and Schroeder there are even little cheer to write chronicles.

Unfortunately we can about the malaise in the EU almost the entire Internet fill. I think of the continuing problem of the Roma gypsies, suppression of free press in Hungary, or the advancing racism under the wings of an American-Jewish-sponsored network of politicians that the culture wars to the incorporation of the U.S. to EU. In short, democracy and EU store today as a rod on a pig.

And yet there is hope.

Arab spring

Nevertheless it may be that Western democracy is not the end of its tether, and that, in contrast, at the beginning of a new and unprecedented boom period. The reason is a surprise from the most obvious kind. Something that even the most optimistic early this year was wholly ignored. Even a science fiction movie about this new development would then have been too radical unbelievable. And yet it is happening. Before our eyes.

The popular uprisings that to happen in the Arab are indeed a groundbreaking development. Or revolutions in the traditional western conceptual frameworks isnog unclear. That it is democracy in its purest sense is clear. Two features are responsible.

1. What we see is a real uprising of the people. There are no clear leaders. No parties or religious groups stands a send direction. In fact, individuals and groups who are still trying up as the leaders did not succeed. Even Mohammed el Baradei not. The image of these revolutions are Libyan citizens who monitor police stations so that the police soon will be able to pick up her work and Egyptians contend that after days of massive Tahrir Square cleanup.

2. There is hardly hate to see. Admittedly, the former dictators must go. They are hated. But revolutions have in common is a total absence of big stories. Arabs want a new leadership and a new system along with freedom. Point on the line. We barely hear or read about anti-Americanism, let alone calls for pan Arabism echo. No, this is a revolution, pure and simple: people want the regime gone, they want freedom, then follow the pragmatic work of recovery.

Naturally the revolutions in the Arab world is not a fait accompli. How could it be after so many years dictatorship. But it is clear that the success of the Arab spring is not about the political future of the Middle East alone. Nothing more or nothing less than the future of democracy is at stake. Based on the above two characteristics, these are perhaps the most democratic revolutions in world history. Whether they will succeed is a question that cuts into the essence of democracy itself.

In fact it also comes down to this: Can the growing Arab lethargic state of the Western democracy model revive? If the answer is no, then the 21 st century is indeed the century of the colliding political entities, the new mercantilism and the rise of authoritarianism such as the EU technocracy, a Confucian China and a Russian gasdictatuur.



"

Muammar el Gaddafi

How Much Does Powerprox Dental Procedure Cost

Muammar el Gaddafi - Berlusconi distanziert sich vom Busenfreund

- Berlusconi distanziert sich vom Busenfreund " Long and narrow Verbündete Galten sie, hat sich nun von Libyen Italiens Ministerpäsident Silvio Berlusconi and Muammar el Gaddafi distanziert Head of State. Der hat Berlusconis Einschätzung zufolge dictator who lost Kontrolle.

"

Who Do Football Coaches Talk To Headset

Monad Look Inward

Monads Look Inward : "

Image via Wikipedia

Philosophers during the modern era wrestled with various philosophical problems. Some of these were cast as new problems, although many had been vexing philosophers since the start of the profession. One of these is the problem of the external world: how do I know that my perceptions match what is real? Another is the mind-body problem: how does the mind interact causally with the body? Leibniz attempted to address these problems (and more) with his monads.

For Leibniz, monads are the fundamental entities that make up the world. They are immaterial and, although they have qualities, they have no parts. There are supposed to be an infinite number of these entities and, apparently, they all perceive. On most interpretations, each monad is a mind. However, the monads do vary in their degree of mental capabilities and they range from the most minimally perceiving monad to the supreme monad (not to be confused with the supreme Dalek or a nacho supreme) which is, of course, God. The higher sorts of monads are conscious and aware while the lower sorts presumably are not. As such, while your soap perceives (think about that the next time you lather up) it is not conscious (which is probably best for both of you).

While all these myriad monads perceive, this perception is not (as Leibniz sees it) a perception caused by external objects. As Leibniz famously claimed, the monads do not have windows and (in addition to making it hard to enjoy warm spring days) nothing enters or departs from them. However, each monad is supposed to mirror all of reality. While I usually use the analogy of a bowl full of polished ball bearings as an analogy to illustrate that bit, the analogy rather obviously fails badly. But, I do think it is a nice image.

While this windowlessness might seem rather odd, it does enable Leibniz to solve two problems with one nad, monad, that is. First, the mind body problem is elegantly solved: reality is fundamentally mental (which I am sure you have long suspected) and hence there are not two distinct metaphysical types to have relationship problems. There is but one type and, perhaps even better, there are no causal relations between these monads (well, aside from God’s act of creation, but God is always mucking up things). Thus, these problems are solved. Well, sort of anyway. Second, the problem of the external world is also solved. Monads do not perceive what is outside of them, for there are no windows via which they interact with an external world. The split between experience and reality that allows the problem of the external world to gain traction simply is not there, hence its wheels spin futilely. Or would, if problems had wheels.

Assuming that you buy this, there are still some obvious problems remaining. One is the matter of addressing the intuitively plausible view that we are perceiving the same reality and that we seem to interact. For example, as I type the blog my husky (a husky monad) is watching. I believe that she is perceiving me doing this and I believe that I am perceiving her perceiving me and that she is no doubt wishing that I was handing her some treats rather than typing. So, how does this work with monads?

For Leibniz the answer is very straightforward. In the beginning, God created all the monads and placed “in” each one all its experiences (sort of like downloading a whole movie before starting to play it). Being really amazing, God makes sure that all the monads are in sync (no, not in the boy band). So, back to the husky example, when I have the experience of seeing my husky and she has the experience of seeing me, we are not “really” seeing each other. Rather Isis (my husky) is having an experience in her mind as if she were seeing me and likewise for me. While I do suspect that husky hair could actually get into a monad, there is no actual causal interaction between us. However, the experiences are in a state of pre-established harmony and hence it all works out. Really.

Not surprisingly, this has caused some people to wonder why this does not just collapse into solipsism. After all, if all my experiences are pre-loaded, then I should have them whether there are any other monads or not. By Occam’s Razor, one might argue, it would seem simplest to hold that I and I alone exist. Or, at best it is just me and the creator-which sticks us (or rather just me) into the problem raised by Descartes. Perhaps even worse, if the God monad perceives everything perfectly, then it would seem to entail that everything is just a quality of God’s mind. This is, of course, pantheism and something the sane generally endeavor to avoid whenever possible. As such, let us quietly close that door and sneak away.

Now that all those problems have been successfully ignored, there is the obvious problem of space. If we are just immaterial monads, then the space we perceive would thus clearly not be space in the usual sense of a box in which God keeps his stuff. Also, what we take to be extended (three dimensional) objects cannot actually be three dimensional in the usual sense.

Leibniz solves the first problem by taking space to be a system of relationships between what a monad experiences. To use a contemporary example, think about “moving” around in 3D video game like Halo or World of Warcraft. It seems like you are moving through space because of the relationship between the elements of your experience, yet there really are not three dimensions in the usual sense. Space is merely a matter of perception and relative to the experiences.

In regards to objects appearing to be extended, this is also a matter of perception. While Leibniz uses the analogy of a rainbow, the video game analogy works even better. In video games we experience what seem to be extended objects, even though they are not actually extended. Rather, the extension is something of an illusion. Likewise for the monad’s experience of extension-it is all in their minds. The monads look inwards and see all that can be seen.

"

Racquel Darrian And His Fans

The Theory of Two Truths in Tibet

The Theory of Two Truths in Tibet : "[New Entry by Sonam Thakchoe on February 17, 2011.]
Tibetan philosophers argue that the two truths theory is not only core ontological doctrine as it is understood within the Indian Buddhist thought, it also makes the central theory behind epistemology and soteriology. The Indian Buddhist schools are named after the theories of the two truths they each upheld as we have seen in the entry on the..."

Transfer Vba Files Togpsphone

Progress

Progress : "[New Entry by Margaret Meek Lange on February 17, 2011.]
Philosophical proponents of progress assert that the human condition has improved over the course of history and will continue to improve. Doctrines of progress first appeared in 18th-century Europe and epitomize the optimism of that time and place. Belief in progress flourished in the 19th century. While skeptics of progress did exist alongside its supporters from the beginning, it was not until the 20th century that theorists backed away en masse from the notion. Many..."

Free Kates Playground Vidios

Transcendental Arguments

Transcendental Arguments : "[New Entry by Robert Stern on February 25, 2011.]
As standardly Conceived, transcendental arguments are taken to Be distinctive in chantiers some sort of claim derived, namely X That Is A Necessary condition for The Possibility of Y - Where Then, Given That Is The Y box, it logically follow that X Must Be The box too. MoreOver, Because thesis arguments are Generally Used to Respond to Skeptics who ... "

Hunter Thermostat 44260 Wiring Colors

la constitution des hierarchies culturelles

The constitution of cultural hierarchies :" This series of two articles tent, from the book by Lawrence Levine Culture top , Culture in low, questioning the meaning of political action in the democratization of culture, in France and the United States. These two great nations share, with different means, however, plans to democratize culture: audience development, arts education, support for the creation (in all its forms). But what conceptions of art and culture underpin these projects? "

Burn Morrowind To An Image

la constitution des hierarchies culturelles (2)

The constitution of cultural hierarchies (2) : "This series of two articles tent, from the book by Lawrence Levine Culture from above, from below Arts, questioning the meaning of the action policy in the democratization of culture in France and the United States. These two great nations share, with different means, however, plans to democratize culture: audience development, arts education, support for the creation (in all its forms).
But what conceptions of art and culture underpin these projects? "

Gift Sayings For Chap Stick

Benjamin / Scholem: conversations avec un absent

Benjamin / Scholem: conversations with an absent "
The trouble with connections, c ' is that it rubs essentially futile when it does not overwhelm. The sake of completeness honors editor but sometimes, it will happen. Unless the letter writers do not indulge in this talk which is certainly the charm of daily life but quickly tired of reading. This is also the title of that correspondence 1933-1940 philosopher, essayist, translator Walter Benjamin (1892-1940) and Gershom Scholem (1897-1982), who has just published under the title Theology and Utopia (Briefweschel, translated from German by Renault and Didier Peter Rusch, 332 pages, 29 euros, Publishing brightness), is exceptional. For the two intellectuals immediately put the bar very high and rarely travel, which, if any, does not exclude humor.

Suhrkamp this collection was published in 1980, but had to wait until, by the obstinacy of a French publisher, other letters were found and that rights issues are resolved, so that the reader of the French language there is finally accessible. The purpose is rarely ano din; futility is not their forte, nor is the small talk . We gain in density what is lost in light. Given to the stature of both men, the exchange is a rare intensity, especially since the publisher had the good idea to assign to each his own translator and his own voice, to keep his truth to their dialogue. To say it is substantial. It is a rare opportunity to attend and the deployment of two minds in action. Gershom Scholem shows himself honest, perceptive and a generous spirit. Even if the mystery remains unimpaired for readers Story of a Friendship (in pocket Hachette Plural) on two questions unanswered Why installed Scholem in Jerusalem has he helped his friend Benjamin in a great financial distress despite his calls? he tried to persuade him to settle in Palestine? In a particularly illuminating afterword, Stephane Moses brings early response.

Dear dear Gerhard Walter ... ... The scholar and bibliophile sedentary nomad, the Jewish mysticism based in Jerusalem and the Marxist wandering exile in Paris, we do not be more opposite. Everything happens but certain topics more than others: the mystical nihilism in the ghetto, flâneur Baudelaire absolute brightness of the ambiguous term "Jewish state", the solution of a condominium Arab and Jew for the whole of Palestine (in 1937 ...), the Paris of the nineteenth century, heretics and false messiahs, the melancholy of two acute thinkers, sensing the imminent end of the world ... Adorno, Brecht, Marx is most often cited. But one writer dominates the conversation: Kafka. One is Benjamin, the mill turns Kafka's friend Max Brod, accusing his contradictions, his bonhomie, his lack of distance, pietistic attitude vis-à-vis St. Franz, his journalistic reflexes, his pictures, his lack of rigor dogmatic. His six-page letter dated June 12, 1938 is the relentless execution of a biography as we've rarely read; watermark, we will book their own worldview Kafkaesque, ellipse torn between mystical experience forged by tradition and that of the inhabitant of a modern city, and starting from this premise, the essayist reasoning weaves a light on the parables at work in all creation sprung from the pen of Kafka to the paradox Final: "Once was assured of the ultimate failure, he succeeded in any way like a dream. Nothing does more to reflect the eagerness with which Kafka emphasized his failure. " remained a mystery in the eyes of Benjamin, his friendship with Max Brod ... To say that the edition of this match is a stimulating wealth. Hopefully, by bringing us back to the depths of his mind, it will "save Walter Benjamin's fans" as called essayist Stephan Wackwitz in an article published in Die Welt and reprinted here English for non-Germans.

About Proust, Walter Benjamin wrote 5 July 1932 from his holiday in Ibiza: "Today I-for the first time in five or six years, started reading Proust and I am excited to see what will teach me about myself and about the time the contrast between the impression that probably reading this happen to me and that felt old. Not that I imagine the contrast so striking and so important. " The man Research is cited only twice. Is that Scholem was not the right person for evoke it (similarly to Baudelaire, that one admires not know when the other). For Proust is in constant Benjamin. Proof, if it is not talking about anyone with anyone. Question of sensitivity even and especially in a strong relationship of friendship. It cites as evidence the On Proust (translated from German by Robert Kahn, 130 pages, 18 euros We editions) just published at Caen in the signature of Walter Benjamin. For the first time are collated his texts, articles, snippets, fragments and scattered remarks, known or novel, devoted to the writer. There not only offers the look of an alien, not native French language, in that work, but that of his German translator, someone who has grappled with his words, his breath, his tongue (he has translated three volumes of the Search ). The impregnation was such that, by his own admission, Berlin Childhood is a palimpsest of Search . What looks like Proust Benjamin? A detective engaged his curiosity about high society, prey to the martyrdom of the recall and the infinite dimension of memory, capable as anyone else to show us things (Proust excelling be that means, and anyone who touches Peguy), insensitive to the intoxication of pure physical feelings of love or food ("Of all the great epic writers, he is one of few not know how to eat his characters'). Walter Benjamin asserted that since the Spiritual Exercises of Loyola, Western literature had not produced a more radical attempt to become absorbed in himself. And if you wonder what took this small editor to engage in the publication of this exciting Proust to Walter Benjamin, a far cry from what is written usually on the subject, the back cover provides a clear answer without appeal (once will not hurt), which should generate much debate:

"The analysis of the Proustian snob, which is much larger than its apotheosis in the art, represents the pinnacle of his social criticism. Because of the snobbish attitude is nothing but the contemplation consistent, organized, hardened, existence from the standpoint of chemically pure consumer. It's less humor that comedy is the real core of the power of Proust, he does not transcend the world through laughter, but laughter he shoots. At the risk of breaking into a thousand pieces, before which there is to it to melt into tears. Songs are: unity of the family and personality, of sexual morality and social respectability. The pretensions of the bourgeoisie broke in the laughter. "

Hence we see that the thought of Walter Benjamin is inexhaustible in any side we want to take it. We had a recent preview with exposure resurrecting his library at the Kunstmuseum in Solingen (North Rhine-Westphalia) and in the catalog that was drawn. Another album just out, just as original, is now available which allows to take full measure of subterranean ramifications of this work: Walter Benjamin Atlas Constelaciones , amazing audiovisual test consists of a DVD movie on some of its ideas, and a digital atlas on CD-Rom linking 900 extracts from his works to 1200 concepts, allowing navigation between his unpublished texts and images. Là encore, un catalog issu d'une exposition qui vient se tenir au the Circulo de Bellas Artes à Madrid.

(et Walter Benjamin Gershom Scholem, "photos DR," Baudelaire par Nadar père and 1855, "Proust" fils par Nadar and 1887)

"

Daylight Per Day Gained After Solstice In Chicago

Lyotard's sublime: Mystery of the 'this-ness' of Italy

Lyotard's sublime: the mystery of 'this-ness' "


The postmodern philosopher known as Lyotard discusses in Chapter 6 of his book, including L' Inhumain his conception of the sublime. He leaves in this chapter from the distinction between the question 'what' is happening and second, because prior to this question "that" something happens. Thus, Lyotard: "Before asking what this is, what this means, before the quid, is like 'first' requires that 'happens', quod. That happens, so to speak, always' advance 'to the question of what happens'. The bare blunt fact is that there is anything at all remains, according to Lyotard is quite beyond our thinking. It 'happens' is also indescribable. He says: "What we can not think is that something happens. Or better, easier said that done. " Our understanding will not only deal with this "there happens'. The 'happening', the 'here and now "resists every attempt to conceptualize and so can not possibly be brought under concepts. The indefinite 'happens' to have full eludes our minds.

precisely this indescribable inaccessible to our understanding 'happens' applies Lyotard as the actual object of the sublime experience. This "not in a seat onomschrijfbare generzijds, another world or another time, but this: that (something) happens." Concerns the sublime 'event' in the 'here and now. Where the sublime in Kant is concerned the real or noumenal the world of the "thing in itself" beyond the senses, we see that Lyotard the sublime again, as before Kant by Edmund Burke, radically immanent is completed. The sublime experience of Lyotard has no transcendental dimension. The Kant Edmund Burke recovered transcendence in the experience of the sublime in Lyotard thus again completely disappears from view. Thus Lyotard says about the sublime in painting: "In determining the painting is indeterminate - the 'happening' - the color, the painting. The color of the painting as event, as event, is not definable, and this just has to testify "and later:" Now, " it is sublime. Not somewhere else, not there or over there, not earlier or later, not earlier. But here, now, done that ... and that is this painting. Here and now the painting rather than nothing, which is sublime.

The unspeakable 'here and now constitutes the object of Lyotard the sublime. Elusive for us thinking 'happens' of Lyotard shows striking similarities with our concept of escaping that particular individual other than the traditional metaphysics has struggled. Thus, by Lyotard in that chapter terms like 'event' and 'his' or 'happening' and 'is' frequently mentioned in one breath. There also seems to him than there is a strong correlation between the 'event' and 'being there'. Thus, for example, Lyotard: "It happened" in the first place 'happening?, Is it? [...] Only then will the question defined by the question: is this or that, it's this or that? ".

Now both the classical and medieval metaphysics vainly racked their brains about the specific individual being. Many classical and medieval metaphysicians have sought individual thing from the mind to fathom. The individual being escaped but all these attempts to understand the thinking. The individual did, in contrast to the universal does not capture by thought. For example, Aristotle considered any given concrete individual thing as a composite of both a physical matter and the other being an intelligible form. The matter is that the thing which exists and the essential form is that what makes the thing what it is. The work of Aristotle can be seen that the matter is that the principle of individuation provides. The individual of a concrete individual thing with a particular creature by comparison with any other concrete individual thing with exactly the same form in Aristotle must lie in the fact that the given thing is a different matter than any fragment of the other things given. That matter is a crucial role in the foundation of the individual's However, given the state of matter in Aristotle is not very plausible. According to Aristotle, matter which is completely unknown and completely free of any structure. How can something that is completely passive and also free of real properties are the principle form of something as fundamental as the individual? This does not seem conceivable.

During the second start of metaphysics in the Latin West, philosophers have therefore sought other solutions to the thinking individual in the grip. For instance, Duns Scotus a concrete individual thing that is formed by hand a general nature and also a principle that he has designated with "this-ness' (haecceïtas). The 'this-ness' shows a general nature to be concrete individual existence. The 'this-ness' indicates the general nature of her final determination. For the conceptual thinking is 'this-ness' is not accessible. The 'this-ness' and thus the individual is guided in Duns Scotus nor grasp concepts. A concrete individual thing, according to Duns Scotus in his only confused express individuality. Following Duns Scotus, Ockham would be the specific individual being of any universal or general ontological category discard. According to him, is merely the individual. He therefore rejects the view that a general nature in the concrete by individual things exist. According to Ockham is universal only in our minds and not an ontological category in the concrete individual things themselves. This nominalist conception deprives the metaphysics of any possibility of the concrete individual thing from conceptual thinking to understand. The individual thus escapes from Ockham to our mind. For the traditional metaphysics as the individual remained a mystery. Individually there was an insurmountable hurdle to our understanding.

In his main work Sein und Zeit in 1927 also attempted Heidegger from the mind to grasp the specific in individual beings. To this end, he worked from an ontological difference between beings and the other of these entities. Heidegger did not want to dwell on the observable characteristics of beings. His program was precisely to the metaphysical being of beings from thinking to unlock. Instead of the given properties of the things suggested Heidegger meaningful way things are central. A. Toll puts it in his college lecture on the existential philosophy and especially the thought of Heidegger as follows: "These are [...] to the presence or existence of things to emphasize, however, not a presence that rigid, but their presence as a significant factor, So such things are present and how things show their presence. Toll also refers in his review that his Safranski Martin Heidegger and his time defines as follows: "Heidegger to the fundamental emotion of factical go forward from this phenomenological show. Heidegger thus focuses on the being of every existing being rather than something that only counts as a property of one or more entities. These are at the level of the concrete individual existence, according to Heidegger since Plato totally into oblivion. These are oblivion to be undone by his understanding from the man again gain access to the being of being. However, as noted in his review Tol is the later Heidegger holds that "the existential analysis of Being and Time remained too abstract." Toll also noted that this analysis Heidegger too much "A purely phenomenological description which was spoken about the existence, but not existence." Similar to the earlier traditional metaphysics Heidegger seems therefore failed to see the concrete being of individual things from the mind to uncover.

recalled having Lyotard seems to describe the sublime as it is completely indescribable and unthinkable 'happens' or 'is' to struggle with exactly the same problems as traditional metaphysics and Heidegger in Sein und Zeit . The failure of metaphysical thinking to the specific individual being minded in its grip for Lyotard appears to be a source of inspiration been. Lyotard approaches the mystery of the concrete individual existence is not from the metaphysical thinking, but from the aesthetic experience of the sublime. Thus, by Lyotard in art found a new way to reflect the ancient mystery of the existence of concrete individual things. Lyotard points in the fourth part of chapter 6 of L'Inhumain therefore the leader of the avant-garde art to demonstrate the non-standard rep indefinable aspects of the "happening" or the brutal fact of it of things. Modern art is not just this indefinable representable 'There is' to present.

(From 'On the sublime in Longinus' - GJE Rutten)

"

Hand Numbness And Heart Burn

Man-marking

I think it is called, which makes the Hugo. Consistent
man coverage. After all, so the Greeks have won a European Championship.

Width B European Shoe

Women vs. Silvio (Corriere della Sera, Milan)

Women of Italy vs. Silvio (Corriere della Sera, Milan) :" On 13 Feburary, women will Demonstrate to Demand Greater respect for feminine diginity and Gender Equality , and to condemn the degrading image of womanhood highlighted by the recent sex scandals have implicated Which Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. (Article) "

What Can I Give My Baby For Flem

Harness

Rig City "

Geert Wilders wants to ban so-called nuisance offenders rig villages. The idea is in each province a mini-Meuse Lace to build, well outside the village, where the rig containers in residential placement. As a repeat offender is a minor, the family must move along.

I plan Wilders mainly excel in a lack of ambition. By nationwide, flaking housing containers to a fallow field somewhere out of sight, what man has it? In my Wilders once close his eyes, breathe deeply, and his imagination free rein, and finally allow himself to think bigger. Then he will automatically understand what really should happen: Harness City.



Collar City is populated by all repeat offenders we have and is therefore surrounded by heavy flow gates. The city is located in a quiet place, but has a good accessibility for both car and public transport. Of course Harness City a reassurance to all hardworking citizens - because everyone now knows exactly where the good and the bad people are sleeping - but let's not all: Collar City is more.

from the idea of "do not ask what you can do for the criminal, but what the criminal can do for you 'is a city next to City harnesses also a lively park. From the sparkling, neon-lit gate you will leave for an urban safari in an agile, armored Smart. Obviously, the tank-like character of this joyous little cars just a precaution: the route along the offenders is completely protected by transparent fences Bullet-proof material. Each car has a guide on board during the tour all can talk about the remarkable, sometimes extremely rare instances that we will encounter: on the left big cousin Bob, who typically found in the paddling pool for his house where he Lidl drinking beer and cheetos eating (forbidden to enter), a little further saunter Jesse B., who has recently been serrated knife used for the practice of a graceful Japanese paper cutting art and on the right side is the debris-covered garden of the family Ter Hagen, everyone just stops at the sight of the two youngest children: it remains a small miracle of nature, how accurate such small fingers crack balls can roll. The

be invincible Harness ruler of the city jungle, a man with the illustrious name Trex, hiding by day in his most detached-house-with two balconies. Because the guides understand that many of the tourists come specially for this king of the underworld with your own eyes, is luring him to an occasional grating box containing a shaky prostitute conjured out of the ground - guaranteed success.

The output is through the gift shop, especially the nepgouden gebitjes are extraordinarily popular.

At the end of the day, all the hard working citizens back to sleep. And they pray that the power never goes down.

"

Little Black Bugs In Poop

Tibetan Epistemology and Philosophy of Language The Problem of Perception

Tibetan Epistemology and Philosophy of Language : "[New Entry by Pascale Hugon on February 2, 2011.]
The birth of the Tibetan epistemological tradition (Tib. tshad ma) follows the reception in Tibet of the central works on the subject by the Indian Buddhist forefathers, principally Dharmakīrti and his commentators. Tibetan epistemology evolved to a large extent in the framework of a commentarial tradition, which did not prevent it from developing into an indigenous system with its..."

Male Masterbaition Game

City Corruption

Corruption" [Revised entry by Seumas Miller on February 2, 2011.
Changes to: Main text, Bibliography]
The causes and effects of corruption, and how to combat corruption, are issues that are increasingly on the national and international agendas of politicians and other policymakers. For example, the World Bank has relatively recently come around to the view that economic development is closely linked to corruption reduction (World Bank 1997) and there have been numerous anti-corruption initiatives in..."

36 Weeks Pregnant With Dark Stool

The Problem of Perception : "[Revised entry by Tim Crane on February 4, 2011.
Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, Internet resources]
Sense-perception - the awareness or apprehension of things by sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste - has long been a preoccupation of philosophers. One pervasive and traditional problem, sometimes called 'the problem of perception', is created by the phenomena of perceptual illusion and hallucination: if these kinds of error are possible, how can perception be what it intuitively ... "

Is Tia Mowry Has Weave

Benedikt XVI. ist politisch "hard law" - Religion Critical Perspectives zu Joseph Ratzinger, a Catholic

Benedict XVI is political." rightwing "- Critical Perspectives on Religion Joseph Ratzinger "
Preface: From

several friends of the "Religion Philosophy Salon" from the far abroad, we were asked a pretty basic post of mine on the political Rechtslastigkeit of Joseph Ratzinger and Benedict XVI. the Internet to the public. The article was published in a 2009 book by the publisher Publik Forum, titled: "role back with Benedict, ed. Thomas Seiterich and Norbert summer. The book with contributions by various authors is highly recommended, even on the occasion of the forthcoming visit of the Pope in Germany in September 2011. My post has already been much quoted, etc., it would be nice if it is always with a reference. Otherwise, for the text:: christian modehn: copyright.

This contribution is the center of a current form of religious criticism.

The right hand of God

Political - Joseph Ratzinger's theological options

By Christian Modehn written on 22 3. 2009

first Regensburg

"Joseph Ratzinger's brother is the head of the cathedral choir. But this is a could actually be a reason to go away from Tübingen, the Catholic theologian Karl Rahner remarked in his characteristic irony (1). In fact, it was not the love of music that Professor Ratzinger to lead, after three years, 1969, dogma give up his chair at the University of Tübingen. It was more the frustration that, for example, his colleague Hans Küng very well could discuss with the rebellious students 1968th The rather timid Ratzinger was the "rebel uprising" against. (2) The move to Regensburg for the future the decisive reorientation. Karl Rahner points out: "Ratzinger has avowedly made a turn, as he went from Tuebingen and Regensburg. (3) On the theological faculty in Regensburg, he was appointed only because a certain originally of Jewish Studies Department there could not be occupied and the free space has now been reclassified into Catholic dogma! The start of Regensburg, he felt as happy as he admits: "That was soon given the right academic aura, which I had for my work so important" (4). His doctrine - was now the conservative colleague Johann Auer, a defender of medieval theology and lovers of the tradition shaped by her Roman training system. Hans Küng called the handling of the dogmatist Accurate with the Bible a "neo quarry exegesis" (5) But Ratzinger was "connected in intimate friendship" with Auer. (6), mainly because both the Church Fathers from 1 to 5 Century valued above all else. Ratzinger participated on Auer's even textbook (!) "Small Catholic dogma." With the move to Regensburg began to Ratzinger, the intensive participation in the International Catholic journal Communio ', in whose founding he was involved in the fall 1969th (7) "Communion" was published in 1972 as a counter-program to the international journal Concilium progressive, which is working on an update of the Second Vatican Council reform, number of prestigious council theologians as Rahner, Küng, Schillebeeckx is one of the founders. In "Communion" collected from the beginning of conservative thinkers, such as Rahner said opponents and conservative ex-Jesuit Hans Urs von Balthasar, Hans Maier Ministers of the CSU or the SPD publicist Otto B. Roegele. He was editor of the bishop, "faithful line Rheinische Merkur. Karl Lehmann also heard from the beginning to circle COMMUNION! Was it and is it something the liberal "excuse" of this magazine? The important thing is: from the beginning belonged to the narrow circle COMMUNION Jorge Medina Estevez also a theologian from Santiago de Chile. In 1987 he became bishop of Rancagua, later, of Valparaiso. There he worked as a close friend of the dictator Pinochet announced he defended until his death in public! As a cardinal in Rome later in Medina cared very sympathetic to the reconciliation with the brothers, Pius. And it came to that nice job on the 19th 4. 2005, so to speak "urbi et orbi" know that "Ratzinger Josephus," his best "Communio - friend", was elected pope.

contribute so on Regensburg's connections to the election of a pope and to reconciliation with the brothers, Pius. It is important that already from Regensburg Joseph Ratzinger of Jorge Medina contacts, especially to Jesuit Father Roger Vekemans in Chile was: he had already written 1973 against the liberation theology in "communion". Vekemans, also a sworn enemy of President Allende and all belonged to the left, and since 1976 with the Opus Dei Adveniat boss and friend, Bishop Franz Hengsbach to the study group and church liberation who fulminated against the Latin American theology of the poor. The roots of Ratzinger's hostility are against liberation theology in Regensburg! The former, for Ratzinger, "competent" Regensburg Bishop Rudolf Graber was a controversial admirer Marie (His motto: "To Jesus through Mary"), he especially admired the miracle of Fatima. He was also an admirer of the stigmatized Therese Neumann of Konnersreuth. As a "passionate reminders" from the excesses of the Second Vatican Council, he was also one of the authors of the characterized by Ratzinger, "Communio". Bishop Graber probably impressed the theologian Ratzinger, because his bishop is an opponent of everything "modernist" and was certainly had sympathy for the newly established, explicitly papst loyal magazine "the rock". In an interview with KNA 28 July 1989 Ratzinger is presented again, "that there are a lot of loyalty and love for Rome in the Catholic Church in Germany." Loyalty and love for Rome: it means love for the Pope, the Vatican, to the "Roman", which was maintained in Regensburg on! have felt under a Bishop Rudolf Graber as Professor Ratzinger must be protected legally. Other authors of "communion," which followed an international network of conservative thinkers, were the later Opus Dei friends Prof. Nikolaus Lobkowicz and the philosopher Robert Spaemann.

occurred in a different form of Regensburg in Ratzinger's Circle: 1975, Kurt Krenn, a hitherto unknown theologian with very few publications, in Regensburg, Ratzinger's colleague in the field of Systematic Theology. This Krenn understood primarily as a scholastic neothomistische doctrine. Ratzinger has Krenn, as he says now as Pope, an "old ties". The Liaison Krenn - Ratzinger later pointed out yet.

second Munich

as Professor Ratzinger on 28 May 1977 was ordained archbishop of Munich and Freising was to put the Regensburg - continue Connection: To the bishops, Ratzinger, the "dedicated", was the already mentioned Bishop Graber of Regensburg and Bishop Stangl of Würzburg. That Bishop Stangl Ratzinger was invited to the consecration of the Frauenkirche in Munich surprised not so far, and Stangl and Ratzinger were friends. And it's amazing: In Stangl of Würzburg diocese a year ago, on 1 7. 1976 in Klingenberg am Main, the student Anneliese Michel Exorcism result of numerous meetings died of exhaustion. The two exorcists, priests Arnold Renz and Ernst Alt, were sentenced to prison for manslaughter on probation. Bishop Stangl as the responsible pastor must approve even of its own motion exorcism, he stressed, however, of "all to have known nothing." "The two exorcists finally discovered Joseph Stangl and his advisors could have belonged to which the then theology professor Joseph Ratzinger. For Stangl and Ratzinger had a "deep relationship" (Main-Post, 06/09/2006) to each other. And it would be unlikely if the current Pope of the exorcism also had no knowledge. " (8). It is known that Benedict XVI. today defended the exorcism explicitly. In his first general audience in 2005, he encouraged the assembled Exorcist "continue" ...

As Archbishop of Munich, Ratzinger had chosen for him as the typical slogan "Cooperators Veritatis." As "employees of the truth" since he was now also produces from his episcopate. He had nothing better to do, when the world was already controversial missionary aggressive promotional, theologically very conservative pope - to establish loyal community of "Neocatechumenal" in his archdiocese. The reports of the Neocatechumenal leader Giuseppe Gennarini from the U.S. and he continues: "As prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith he has us later always helped and in several of his books the Neocatechumenal way to really positively valued" (9)

as "employees of the truth," he stressed already in his Munich Sylvester sermon that obedience is the answer to the truth, because the Christian faith is clear. He said in a general situation aroused because his colleague Hans Küng in Tübingen had a few days earlier, lost by that of the Roman religious authority, his right to teach as a Catholic theologian. Ratzinger said in Munich: "In abandoning the arrogant binding truth is, the man Christ contrary "(10) showed even then the" so important intellectuals "as a fierce critic of the critical reason:" The Church's teaching authority, it is ordered to defend the faith of the simple against the power of the intellectuals " (11). This sound later preferences Benedict XVI. for popular folk saint, it's about the allegedly stigmatized by many observers, but as a charlatan called Capuchin Padre Pio in southern Italy, and the totally anti - intellectual Curé of Ars in France, this John Vianney, who calls himself "simply in the thinking called "is now in Jahre2009 of Benedict XVI. officially praised as a model for all priests.

As an employee "of the" right to truth, Ratzinger was the crackdown on rebellious priest: disobedience own thinking and have no place in an authoritarian thinking. That's why he wanted the summer of 1980 to remove the glass from parochial vicar William Arget from his office: it had objected to the call of the Archbishop, the municipalities should generously donate to the Peter's Pence: This should be the Vatican's finances are reorganized. Pastor Glass contradicted John Paul II, who deals with the so inhuman remarried divorcees, earn no money donation. The Cardinal was outraged. Because clearly solidarity the laity with their pastor was allowed to remain in the glass office. (12)

His theological antipathies against progressive, supposedly left by theologians, Ratzinger sat in Munich. As the successor of theology professor Heinrich Fries was suggested by the Munich Faculty of Theology of the critical and "political theologian Johann Baptist Metz Munster, a friend of the theologian Karl Rahner's council. "The Cardinal Ratzinger, in collaboration with the Culture Minister (and communion employees) Hans Maier, Metz did not, means that in 1979 the Ministry of Metz at the ceremony was over" (13), writes Karl Rahner. Metz had even then his sympathies for liberation theology expressed. Hans Maier has characterized as president of the Central Committee of German Catholics for many years the development of the Catholic Church in his conservative sense (in agreement with Cardinal Ratzinger). Only 4 years was Joseph Ratzinger as Archbishop make certain experiences in the church base.

third Rome

As head of the supreme religious authority in the Vatican in November 1981, he has fought left-wing, critical theologians and movements and marginalized, which is known. Less known are his simultaneous explicit preference for the more right-wing movements and theologians in church and society. This "preference right" can only exemplary Examples are illustrated. Point but once again, where the interests of the Cardinal Ratzinger and Pope are. Who will protect the "right" point of the church can, of modernity proper democratic forms of co-decision of the laity in the Church, as under national synods, only be described as "fantasy" as the Canadian Jesuit Michael Fahey (in the January issue Concilium of 1989, p. 84) writes: "For Ratzinger, this idea of a mixed synod as a permanent form of higher authority in the church is an adult fantasy. He also may think it not inconceivable that a layman could ever exert authority over a diocese. " Because of this deep aversion to the Democratic in the Church Ratzinger can only recognize groups that Rome not only love, "as he likes to say, but also the clerical power structure and the Vatican as an absolutist system without any supervision by the much invoked "church people" support and defend in principle. The psyche of such people, give opt for such defense, is a separate, far too little worked on ...

As head of the supreme religious authority, it was his aim, his own understanding of faith and theology, between freedom and authority in the whole Church, and may impose in the western society. Karl Rahner has criticized this attitude from the beginning. He writes in 1984: "It would be important for Ratzinger, to clearly distinguish between clear and Ratzinger as a theologian with his legitimate, perhaps even problematic own opinions, and Ratzinger as head of the Roman Congregation. These are two very different things. It is understood that a Roman prelate has a particular theological view. However, he may impose on others is not registered ". (14). In fact, according to Ratzinger as his episcopal motto "employees of the truth," his interpretation of truth, which he described as an eternal and fixed deposit of faith ("fixed of faith and ready ") understands enforced with sanctions and pressure. The list of Ratzinger as the outcast, internationally renowned theologian is very long. Even longer is the list of those who have under this rigid system, freed from the Roman Church. Ratzinger has so far acted as a "liberation theologian" very special.

strong What is the relationship Ratzinger with right-wing groups, also shows the selection of his housekeepers: As a cardinal in Rome provided him women of the religious community "The Work", founded by Mother Julia Verhaghen "from Flanders, 1996 accused of 2 priests Limburg / Netherlands this now international, would also work in Germany, movement, sectarian act and its members under heavy moral pressure at a medieval spirituality. The competent Dutch Bishop Wiertz could not investigate the allegations because "the work" directly to the Pope is under the ... (see Volkskrant, Amsterdam, 08.28.1996).

the papal palace now take care of women who also conservative movement "Communion and Liberation around the physical well-being of the Pope. This international movement used to be the engine of the Italian Christian Democrats, now it is very close to Berlusconi.

In the household of the Pope going to hand him his private secretary: Monsignor Georg Gänswein has connections to Opus Dei: He was a church lawyer for some years a lecturer at the Opus Dei Roman university. Even if he should not belong to Opus: This university undoubtedly employs only people who are of the Opus Dei direction is not critical of at least! What Ratzinger's theological concerns

preferences for Germany, so is its support for the very conservative area be moved to "a forum of German Catholics," remarkable. The "Forum" is a alternative to the least interested German Catholic ecumenical days. The forum of German Catholics organized since 2001 annual meeting, which gathered all the relevant spectrum of an explicitly Roman Catholicism. Included are the Legion of Christ, the fellowship of Beatitudes, the Opus Dei, the Totus Tuus movement that the SE of Rome advocated "total devotion" take pains and representatives of the German nobility who join in the Regnum Christi, the lay organization of the Legion of Christ, etc. . etc. "Cardinal Ratzinger was at our first meeting, of course, present and 2005, he should keep with us the closing service, but he was Pope," says the organizer Hubert Gindert. He is also editor of the Pope or from Regensburg times known monthly magazine "The Rock". Gindert continues: "Of course, I then Cardinal Ratzinger also visited his home in Pentling, near Regensburg, where he told me: To me, it will not respond to the large number. With it depends on whether it is in the Church Missionary cells. " (15)

It is no wonder that Cardinal Ratzinger from the beginning, the "missionary cell" of the traditionalist Peter brothers, supported those priests who have renounced in 1988 by Archbishop Lefèbvre groups, but celebrate faithfully the old Latin Mass more allowed. In the seminary in Bavaria Wigratzbad Cardinal Ratzinger was also next to the ultra-conservative cardinals from Austria Groer, Stickler and Mayer welcome guest! (16)

The deep connection to this community is safe with Ratzinger also due to the desire for the uniform and obedient, self-contained, "beautiful" Church of the childhood and youth. But even tough the calculation is: the ultra conservative communities of priests, like the brothers Peter and the Legion of Christ, many seminarians who share their enthusiasm with their clerical identity in the black cassock and practice obedience as the highest virtue. These circles will save in the view of Ratzinger the power of the old clerical church!

In Austria, Cardinal Ratzinger always set to the small, absolute and faithful and right-wing parties, such as the "Linz priest circle." 1980Jahre Ratzinger was the end of the speaker at the annual summer schools in Aigen, where he defended the Latin Mass even then explicitly. Permanent officers were the cardinals Scheffczyk of Opus Dei or the conservative dogmatists Prof. Anton Ziegenaus.

is so early already familiar with Ratzinger best Upper Austria. Also resigning after violent protests Linz Maria Bishop Gerhard Wagner, the priest circle (17). The Linz priest group was significantly influenced by Ratzinger's friend and former colleague Kurt Krenn Regensburg. In 1987 he was appointed to the surprise of all insider Auxiliary Bishop of Vienna, apparently his friend Ratzinger had contributed to it: "The Vienna wondering more about the fact that the newly appointed Auxiliary Bishop Krenn was given special responsibility for the world of art, literature and science. In a television interview he could not name a single contemporary Austrian artists, painters, poets, sculptors, writers, musicians or scientists. That was disturbing. The real reason why Krenn was appointed, was to be a watchdog over the Austrian Bishops' Conference, where he, despite his status as a service recently, by weight, got that as one was, "had the ear of the Holy Father" of the. (18) 1991 Krenn was appointed Bishop of Sankt Pölten: There could be no contradiction Roman establish some spiritual extremely conservative groups that were being distributed from Bavarian dioceses because of their reactionary stance, such as the Order of Jesus Servi et Mariae ", literally "slaves of Jesus and Mary." The blind spot market, this Order's headquarters. Founder is the initiator of the conservative "Scouts of Europe known former Jesuit Father Andrew Hönisch. About Krenn was authoritarian and for most lay people and priests often unbearable Governance reported, for example by the former abbot of Geras, Joachim Angerer (19) After a pornography - and obvious affair homosexual contacts between seminar leaders and students in his seminary was Krenn to 2004 his bishop. Since the time it was his health was not good. Am 18.6. 2005, a few weeks after his election, had his old friend and patron, Joseph Ratzinger, to do nothing better than to write him a letter unctuous. This document must be all those who have suffered under the regime of Bishop Kurt Krenn, appear as a slap in the face. The letter also reveals the (true?) Spiritual dimension of the current pope: Here are some quotes from the handwritten signature Letter: brother "Dear! I hear that you are suffering in body and soul. It is close to my heart to let you get a sign near me. For a long time I pray every day for you! .... Our Lord has not ultimately redeemed by his words and deeds, but through his suffering. If the Lord up now as it takes with the Mount of Olives, then you shall know that you're just embraced so very far from his love and help in the acceptance add your suffering allowed to what is lacking in the sufferings of Christ (Col. 1, 24) I pray much that you burst into troubles all the wonderful certainty ... .... From the heart I send you my apostolic blessing. In old ties! Your Pope Benedict XVI. (20).

The terms of this letter are of a traditionalist-sounding piety coined a Lefèbvre faithful Pius brother probably could not put this another way, aside from the fact that all critical information is missing from Krenn's unspeakable behavior, such as his much-discussed proximity to the right-wing populist Joerg Haider FPÖ. Kurt Krenn coy not to write the official book of condolences for those killed in an accident politicians: "High Estimated family funeral,

may I express my deepest sympathy to the so sudden and unexpected death of the Lord Governor Dr. Jörg Haider. I was allowed to meet with him several times and met him as a man of integrity and interesting discussion partners ... In your prayer, thinking of your + Kurt Krenn (21). These words of Ratzinger friend are a disgrace when you consider the inflammatory rhetoric against foreigners, for example, Haider led ...

During his visit to Austria, Benedict XVI had it. not assume that the visit also known as a stronghold of tradition, Holy Cross Convent School in Vienna, which he had raised just before his visit in September 2007 in January of that year for "Pontifical University". Auxiliary Bishop Andreas Laun, extremely conservative theologian from Salzburg is one, there the faculty ... the love of Benedict XVI. to Holy Cross for two reasons: lots of "classic young priest" and the "eternal", the classical theology!

Some theological proposals are then Ratzinger also interested in the political and explicitly right-wing extremist milieu. The "Documentation Center of Austrian Resistance (DÖW) has classified the AULA Verlag in Graz to be quite extreme. There was in 1998 in the edited by Otto Scrinzi commemorative "1848th Heritage and Mission "Ratzinger COMMUNION review of 1995, entitled" Freedom and truth reprinted. Even if this is not explicitly right-wing is: It is astonishing even if editors come about the idea of Ratzinger to present in their own communities. The "mirror" is before the correspondence with the Great Hall of the Vatican publishing house, which indicates that the then secretary of the cardinal, Josef Clemens, the publication of the article expressly agreed. The auditorium publisher had praised the work of the Holocaust denier Walter Lüftl, whereupon even the FPÖ distanced from the publisher (22). Publisher promotes the hall in his Internet site for the controversial book about 1848 to today (21 3, 2009) with an explicit statement "With a review of Cardinal Ratzinger." The Pope does not seem to be uncomfortable with these instructions, or he does not read the international press, which since the 14th .3. 2009 reports on these relationships.

In France, Joseph Ratzinger has proven time and again that he right-wing ultra-conservative groups and a special closeness, if not Care added. Typical is his efforts at reconciliation with the schismatic originally Lefebvre impaired convent of Sainte Madeleine in Le Barroux in Avignon. 1989 returned to the monastery Abbot Calvet back to the "Roman womb" because the monks, the pope formally recognized, and the old re-Thomistic theology of the 19th Century there is more widespread and of course the show in the rite of the 16th Century under the direction of Pius V. still celebrated. Many newspapers had been the 1980Jahren of the close links with far-right politicians Abbot Calvet from the party Front National (FN leader Jean Marie le Pen) detected. Bernard Antony, the "national-catholic" Euro MP of that party, is as closely connected with the monastery as the FN also close to the journalist Jean Madiran. He has conducted interviews with Abbot Calvet sympathizing with the FN in the "radio station courtesy." The National Catholic Jean Madiran had (executed 1945) 1995, a memorial ceremony for the famous French Nazi propagandist Robert Brasillach held ...

These relationships were the "employees" who apparently only divine, but not political "truth" Joseph Ratzinger, who cares! When these monks there you Missal according to the instructions of the 16th Century gave out with the appropriate instructions on Good Friday to pray for the apostate Jews, "wrote Cardinal Ratzinger in 1990 the preface. (23) The Missal is still in the monastery shop have there. In September 1995, Ratzinger attended as the supreme head of the monastery of faith and celebrated Mass there. Obviously he is very impressed there, because many young monks who have yet to radical tonsure and love the old monk's robes. (24)

Benedict XVI. On 6 September 2006, also in the far right Settled "Institut du Bon Pasteur" (Institute of the Good Shepherd) in Bordeaux allowed. A separate seminary "Vinzens St. Paul was built on the estate of the Marquis de Gontaud-Biron in the diocese of Chartres. The top "Good Shepherd" is the former priest Philippe Lefèbvre Laguérie. He had defended in 1987 the far-right politician Le Pen openly claiming this as there were no gas chambers. "The thesis of the professors negationist Faurisson and Roques, to which Le Pen are a perfect science," he said then. Father Laguérie was pastor of Saint Nicolas du Chardonnet in Paris, which is occupied since 1977 by traditionalists, 1994 Laguérie wanted a church in Paris once again steal the diocese of Paris, by occupation, but the police did this time. He has held a requiem for Paul Touvier, the anti-Semitic leader of the militia from the time Pétain. (25) His brother is in Bordeaux Père de Tanoüarn, he was a member of the extreme right-wing newspaper "Choc du mois" Le Pen and the station "Radio Courtesy". Now these priests with the consent of Benedict XVI. reunited with Rome. You can now officially spread amidst the Catholic Church its right-wing thought. International connections are

it long ago. Just one example: Gerald Probst Göschenen also reconciled with Rome from the traditionalists Community of the oratorio Philip Neri in Berlin (of Berlin Cardinal Sterzinsky approved the establishment) congratulated Father Laguérie to his new role as the Good Shepherd in Bordeaux, Goschen had incidentally also good relations with the monastery of La Madelaine Calvet with Abt. (26)

Also at the removal of the left, progressive, and by many people outside the Church esteemed bishop of Evreux, Jacques Gaillot, in 1995, was reconciled with Rome and take part of Ratzinger estimated monastery in Le Barroux: "Groups like Opus Dei and the abbot of the monastery of Le Barroux were heard in Rome to my cause. They had vowed to get my skin. Now they have, then this People have won "(27). Since the time of his demotion and punishment of such popular Bishop Gaillot living as pastor of the diocese Partenia virtual desert in a little room in the convent of the Fathers of the Holy Spirit "in Paris. And wanted to keep as the skilled in the desert in October 2004, Bishop Gaillot a speech in Bonn, it was Cardinal Meisner (Cologne) issued a gag order. From the "Kölner Stadt Anzeiger Gaillot was made on this occasion the question:" Do they have the impression that attempts Meisner, Cardinal Ratzinger, perhaps stimulating the Pope personally against them, "Bishop Gaillot answered:" Yes, I am afraid . I assume that there is close contact regarding my person ... my liberalism's scary "

(28)

4th

Examples of the conservative preferences Joseph Ratzinger and his determined struggle against all liberals, leftists, liberal-minded Catholics could continue for many countries. It is interesting that he promotes in Germany so far unknown, but already powerful right-wing religious. This includes the Instituto del Verbo Incarnato "from Argentina, which now has over 500 mainly young members. This official, Roman - Catholic Order is expressly the Argentine nationalism closely. He wants to defend "the pure and natural values of Argentina" against atheists. "This order will determine the society in matters of politics, morality, education," said the Argentine sociologist Prof. Veronica Gimenez Beliveau in an article for "Courrier International". Many bishops have banned the Argentine Institute to open a seminary. In 2001, Cardinal Ratzinger was willing to settle this controversial episcopal order in his own diocese of Velletri-Segni in Italy. You have to understand. Kurienkardinäle are always entitled to bishops "of a certain local diocese such is Cardinal Ratzinger, Bishop of Velletri-Segni, Italy. The Institute of the Incarnate Word has hailed it and I quote "thank Providence," which, as "your titular" was also Pope (29). The international cultural magazine "Courrier International" gave her review of the Order entitled "The soldiers of the Incarnate Word: How the Middle Ages." Meanwhile work these young "missionaries dynamic" in many countries around the world, including in Holland, Iceland and Greenland.

be the end must also be made to Spain, because the battle between fundamentalist Pope fans and a modern democracy most violent rages. On 28 October 2007, Benedict XVI. nearly 500 victims from the English Civil War beatified, they fought all on the "right", ie on the part of the "arch-Catholic" and dictator Franco. That there were also priests and Catholic lay people who risked their lives in the popular front against fascism, was overlooked by the Pope gene. Thus, the beatification of the late Franco Transfiguration of the crusader and a clear political critique of the socialist Spain of today, where so happen "anti-God things," as the full equality of homosexual couples. The opposition People's Party PP "thought about this course mass political beatification. Although Benedict XVI. this ceremony made yourself, but it was the best of terms with him as the person responsible for all Selig - and Saints. Benedict XVI. now has one of the most violent PP supporters and defenders of the old English order, "Cardinal Canizares of Toledo, called to Rome, he should take care as the top boss for the" right form of worship "... The Vatican bureaucracy is becoming a collection of very conservative church leaders and subordinate prelates, this development began under Pope John Paul II already.

This closes the circle of a foreclosed in itself, anti-modern church, which is determined essentially by Joseph Ratzinger. "Can so-called cults are also many millions of members? To critical intellectuals to ask in view of the state of the Roman Church today. You know of course that could be only punished very question of "yard", ie from the Vatican, ...

show these short observations: The love of Joseph Ratzinger draws on all right-wing like a "(?) Red thread through his life" since Regensburg. Therefore, the lifting of the excommunication of the four traditionalist bishops of Pius - Brotherhood is no "exception" and not a "mistake". Joseph Ratzinger believes himself as "employees of the truth" well as the "right hand of God."

PS:

If common in this small and incomplete overview of the somewhat bold word is used "conservative", it is in this context as a symbol for anti - feminist, anti-emancipatory for homophobic and rather anti-ecumenical, and "conditionally democratic, etc., to spare the reader the enumerations of these predicates always, I use the summary and not, as we saw," picked off "symbol" conservative. "

Footnotes:

1) Karl Rahner, confessions, Vienna - Munich 1984, p. 40

2) as reported by Prof. Hermann Häring, 1968 student of theology in Tübingen, in an interview with the author in 2007.

3) Karl Rahner, ibid. The same opinion has the theologian Wolfgang Beinert, in: "The theologian Joseph Ratzinger, 1977, Kösel Verlag, p. 4

4) This daily newspaper quoted the internet point from 1 9. 2006 http://www.tagespunkt.de/

5) Hans Küng, Theology on the Move 1987th

6) Ulrich Lehner, Johann Auer article, see http://www.bautz.de/bbkl/a/auer_j.shtml

7) Joseph Ratzinger, Symposium on 28. May 1992 to mark the 20th anniversary of communion at the Gregorian University, Rome, p. 3

see www.theologe.de / bischof_josef_stangl.htm

9) Zenit, Information Service of the Legionaries of Christ, 01/09/2006

10) Süddeutsche newspaper on 2 1. 1980, a review of Rosel Termolen.

11) ibid An argument that recurs again and again: "The security of seeing belief often far more at home

than where capitalized as reflection. But, it would not always seeing the intellect. " Sun Ratzinger: "The situation of the church today", Cologne 1977, p. 24 f.

12) Hartmut Meesmann, in "Die Zeit" 23 1. 1981

13) Karl Rahner, ibid S 42

14) Karl Rahner, S ibid. 40f.

15) Hubert Gindert in Kaufering in an interview with the author 2006th

16) see the website of the Peter brothers http://fssp.eu

17) Bruck Josef Moser, Salzburger Nachrichten of February 3, 2009th

18) The Tablet, the Catholic weekly published in London, 21 2. 1991

19) Joachim Angerer, as a progressive abbot of a monastery Premonstratensians, himself a victim Krenn, among other things wrote the book "Austria by Krenn and Co", Vienna 2000.

20) This remarkable letter is not (yet) found at: http://stjosef.at/bischof . K.krenn, under the News section.

21) Jörg Haider see the condolence book at: http://kondolenz.ktn.gv.at/default.aspx?SIid=95&page=12

22) http://aula.buchdienst.at/buecher /? id = 445

23) La Vie, Paris, L Chrétien Hebdomadaire d Actualité, Num 3309, 29th Janvier 2009, p. 28

24) Henri Tincq, Le Monde, Paris, 14 06. 1998th

25) on the web: http://intransigeants.wordpress.com/2008/08/10/vive-labbe-laguerie/

also

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_Lagu% C3 % A9rie

26) Göschenen Probst in an interview with the author in the Church of St. Afra Berlin in 2003. On his "friendly contacts the Benedictines of Le Barroux" is referenced on the web http://www.institut-philipp-neri.de/institut still!

27): Elie Maréchal, L Affaire Gaillot, Paris 1995, page 189, the interview took place on 5 February 1995 First French television TF1 instead.

28) Harald Biskup interviewed Jacques Gaillot, Kölner Stadt Anzeiger, 26.10.2004.

29) Courrier international. Hors Serie: "Au nom de Dieu. Pourquoi les religions se font la guerre. "Mars 2007, page 62

for the worship of the "Institute of the Incarnate Word for their patrons Joseph Ratzinger: See also their website: http://www.ive.org. The information herein is found in "Noticias" on 20/04/2005 with the title: "El Papa Benedicto XVI era nuesto obispo titular".
"

Ultimate I Spy Paper City 6 Arrows

Loyal Opposition in der Kirche - ein Widerspruch

Loyal Opposition in the Catholic Church - a contradiction "
A word first:

Sometimes the philosophizing that reflective thinking, as Heidegger says, correctly, offered to peace, because at criticism of religion constantly input is needed.

end of 2010, I had the recommended REPUBLIC FORUM magazine wrote a review of the question: Has the so-called " loyal opposition "within the Roman Church a certain sense. My time prescribed in the near future given answer is: no.

Because I asked many friends from distant regions of the completion of this text to read (to) be able to, I offer it here like to to read, especially since the declaration of more than 140 theologians in Germany in early February 2011 creates the impression and the hope is awakened, verbal loyal opposition would still make some sense. Hence, the following text from Publik Forum currently remains. Copyright: Christian modehn.

Loyal Opposition in the Roman Church - an illusion
By Christian
Modehn

no one can deny it: Fundamental changes in doctrine and structure of the Roman Catholic Church of reform were not effected. It is time to get it to see: The Roman system is a divinely ordained and immutable. The men of the church can talk at no one outside of the hierarchy in their governance. This means that any hope of synodal structures is illusory.

The self-definition of the reform Catholics "as a" loyal opposition, a misunderstanding: Opposition is an essential element of democracy, opposition parties are in principle able to take over the government after the elections. Even extra-parliamentary groups have one chance to have a say in democracy.

The powers that be of the Roman church, however, define their church is not a democracy, but as a separate organization - such as the "mystical body of Christ." The Catholic theologian Hans Küng aptly calls the church "the only existing absolutist system of the Western world." "Loyal opposition" have no chance to discuss their concerns with the Democratic hierarchy, let alone implement then.

The Roman System is pleased to perhaps sometimes these counties because they give the impression that there would be a bit progressive in Catholicism. In the everyday life of the church is governed by contrast, hard world. Without the co-affected pastoral and financial concepts are enforced, reactionary bishops are replacing decades or less open-minded bishops. Reform Catholics, however, can not align with appeals. After the exposure of numerous crimes committed by pedophile priests, those who brought the issue into the public, no chance to be involved in the reform of canon law or to ensure that the official doctrine of sex is human.

The "commit loyal opposition," the mistake of idealizing the Second Vatican Council as a reform council. In fact it was due to many ambiguous Decisions when no fundamental reform council within the meaning of the Reformation. The celibacy law continues, the ecumenical communion is no step forward, it only gives synodal structures Synods in which the Pope has the last word. Progressive Council theologians, "loyal opposition" of the early period, have failed halfway. The recognition of religious freedom forced the clerical public, not a "loyal opposition". A return to this Council can not therefore bring about the urgent reformation of the Roman Church.

The term "good faith" means something like "the authorities" respecting. Loyal dissident Catholics do so but "be faithful" to the written hierarchy. They are driven by the "love of the Mother Church." It should be a Christian love only God and your neighbor and yourself "The" love of the Mother Church is opposed by the hierarchy suggested to mask the harshness of the Church's permanent apparatus.

remain two possibilities: first, the sober recognition that the Roman Catholic Church is to remain a major conservative organization, and is today a mix of Opus Dei and Padre Pio, Fatima and the Neokatechumenat. Second, the critical observation that encapsulated in the large organization that you safely to the democratic Media can leave. Reform Catholics could in the face of the absolutist system live better than church dissidents. That would not change just the financial situation of the Church.

It would consider the establishment of free ecumenical communities (which in the Netherlands and Switzerland have for years), also about the liberating power of conversion to Protestant and liberal churches. Need for the connection with God is always a religious framework? Reform Catholics should live liberation theology - for example the establishment of new spiritual places.
?

Los Hombres De Paco Onlijne Episodes

Will You Live Forever?

Will You Live Forever "The cover of every single edition of TIME magazine (US, Europe, Asia, South Pacific) this week has the same title: “2045: The Year Man Becomes Immortal.” It is the most mainstream endorsement of the Singularity - the time when artificial intelligence overtakes human intelligence - we’ve seen in ...

Read More "

How It Will Cost To Install Travertine

Crossing Lines - Conor Harrington in Israel and Palestine

Crossing Lines - Conor Harrington in Israel and Palestine : "
Crossing Lines from Andrew Telling on Vimeo .


Crossing Lines documents Conor Harrington;s trip to Tel Aviv, Israel and Bethleham, Palestine in May 2010.
"

Metal Core Wheels Yak Sale

Türkei: Ankara plant chemical Kastration von Vergewaltigern

Türkei: Ankara plant chemical castration of rapists "

A draft law provides in Turkey for heated debates: The ruling AK Party wants tougher sentences for sex crimes - Repeat offenders should be treated medically

.

"

Inner Ankle Pressure Point For Starting A Period

Bibliothèques: les Lecteurs entrent and resistance

Bibliothèques: les lecteurs de résistance entrent "

Jour J au Royaume-Uni Celui que les lecteurs ont choisi pour. sonner the alarm. This is not the culture is being murdered, this thing vague, formless, elusive, superfluous as all successive governments have gone through losses rather than profits, even before the Education and Health: What are the public libraries that we will be officially removed. The heavy concrete and ! This is the first time a popular movement was launched as large as spontaneously on a topic that is not directly political. As if the borrowing of library books was as vital as food staples. Some 400 public libraries are threatened with closure because of budget cuts eliminating their subsidy. In some places, it will be more dramatic than other: thus, in the Isle of Wight , 9 out of 11 libraries will close. 80 events are held on Saturday throughout the country (see map interactive) to mobilize public opinion on the scandal. Number of writers and artists are helping to Save our libraries by multiplying the day coups: readings, balloon releases, running, petitioning, rants, happenings ... The campaign has for weeks on Facebook and Twitter. Defendants, municipal and national leaders of their argument Culture of widespread Internet and reading online and the need to modernize the tool library by removing it as it deemed outdated. To replace an engine room? The Culture Minister Ed Vaizey has himself adopted this anthem on the mode: since readers have all the information at home through internet, they no longer need to travel to a library ... This making it more bitter still reading his last post on his blog : he asserted (in June) that despite the difficulties of the times of crisis, it would do everything not only to support public libraries but to develop them so they do content not only to lend books ...

(Misuse of posters by Phil Bradley)

"

Tiffany Towers-find Tubеs

Instant happiness

Instant geluk"
februarinummer In het een staat van Scientific American uittreksel uit het nog te verschijnen book "Beyond Boundaries: The New Neuroscience of Connecting Brains with Machines" the neuroscientist Miguel AL Nicolelis. The book is about "neuroprosthetics", or replacing parts of the nervous system by technical devices. The writer assumes that the devices faster, more robust and reliable than the nervous system. Actually the article is not more than a pamphlet that an unrestrained transhumanism advocates, that is, efforts to improve the human race by technical means. This is shown by the phrases "I feel an intense urge to embrace the amazing possibilities that freeing our minds from the limitations of our earthly bodies our species can bring. "

Nicolelis provides a future that not only makes the deaf hear and the lame shall walk, but even Twitter and Facebook will render superfluous, because we will direct from brain to brain communication. We would without physical discomfort with our brain can control avatars in hostile environments humans can do research and exploration. We might or might even feel what another feels. And of course everyone's mind, we can capture in a digital medium, so that knowledge, experience and personality can be maintained even after someone dies. Nicolelis calls us to "dream big", so all those beautiful pictures of the future to actually achieve.

But is such a future is so wonderful? If you dream of a future dominated by technology from the past look shows that the future of that past are still very different from the dreams of then have foreseen. And I'm not talking about what to do or not those dreams come true. Some problems still seem more stubborn than they want to have those dreams. We still have no such colony on the moon, let alone on Mars, even fifty years ago, one saw it happen around the turn. But the dreams of the past did not foresee the negative aspects of large-scale application of these future technologies. If every world one car at his disposal, this would the CO2 problem have become completely unmanageable, let alone that we would have enough resources to build all those cars.

You may also wonder what the future is that such a dream to create a bright future. It is wonderful that technology in some cases can help to alleviate the suffering of people. But technology can also increase people's happiness? Have the car, radio, television, computers and the Internet made people happier? Are we happier, happier, more relaxed than the generations who had all these beautiful things? Happiness is difficult to measure. Happiness researchers base their assessment on what they make of onderzoeksopbjecten say. But they can not their personal happiness compared with that of others. They know only their own positive or negative feelings. What is clear is that people often anticipate happier than possession. Rejoice with you on the Christmas gifts that you will get. But afterwards it is still often held. And the pleasure that owning a new car, computer or television yield wears quickly.

It is great to strive for a better world for humanity. But we know better how the world would be? Is it better for us if we completely free from suffering? Nietzsche struggled throughout his life with his ailments, but he felt that without this disease could not have done what he did and be who he was. His identity was partly due that certain ailments. Would a man as he was perfectly happy, still have an identity? According to Plato we recognize objects because we can compare them to our mind with perfect prototypes. But a prototype in itself represents all objects of a type. Although it is perfect, it does not have any personality. If we human beings can be happy if we could not differentiate from others?

How can technical people happier? The technique can help us set goals. The technique allows us faster and stronger. The technology can make us fly and sail. And thanks to technology we can communicate around the world. But while there is always a limit between the device and man. The man controls the machine with hands and feet. The brains of the device separated by the senses and limbs. They play a role in that they record what the senses receive and they control the limbs. Between the will of the person and the actions of the unit is a chain of conversions that human impulses translate into machine operations. But the levers, steering wheels, pedals and knobs that are required to hear the machine. And the senses and limbs belong to the person. And they help determine what that person until that person makes.

People are not machines. They have different goals and different functions. And they are different. People are driven by passions and desires. And as David Hume remarked, that the passions and desires that reason its goals. Reason itself has no wishes or desires. Its task is only to goals and satisfy desires, if possible by technical fireworks. Reason is very good at building on principles and combining functions. Ask the ideal man to build a reason and she gives you a deadline indestructible robot that acts according to an irrefutable logic.

But why so difficult to do? If it only matters that people feel happy, and if there any trick is acceptable, why not the chemicals called in to help? Why people will grow if the same reach with a simple pill? Give everyone who wants an endless supply of ecstasy or an improved version, and it does not matter how they are structured. Such instant happiness is a lot cheaper than all these technical alterations.

"